Abstract

Introduction: Risk stratification of patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) using either Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score (GBS) or preendoscopy Rockall score to facilitate early safe discharge (GBS=0, pre-Rockall=0) has been reported. This observational study compared score utility and considered the impact of extending the range of GBS or pre-Rockall scores permitting safe discharge.

Methods: Consecutive adult patients presenting to acute medical admissions or the emergency department from September 2008-March 2009 with suspected UGIB had clinical history, vital signs, laboratory and endoscopy results prospectively recorded using electronic databases. GBS, pre-Rockall scores and a composite endpoint (blood transfusion, endoscopic therapy, interventional radiology, surgery or 30-day mortality) were calculated.

Results: 388 patients with suspected UGIB were identified of which 92.3% were admitted (median (range) GBS=5 (0-19) and pre-Rockall=2 (0-11)) and 7.7% discharged (GBS=0 (0-4) and pre-Rockall=0 (0-4)). 186 (47.9%) underwent in-patient endoscopy. 151 (38.9%) were found to have the composite endpoint with 77.5% having transfusion, 45.7% endoscopic treatment and an 8.0% mortality within 30 days. AUROC (95% CI) for 30-day composite endpoint was 0.92 (0.89-0.94) using GBS and 0.75 (0.70-0.80) using pre-Rockall scores. Analysis using different GBS thresholds demonstrated that GBS=0, GBS ≤1 and GBS≤2 had superior utility in identifying freedom from an adverse clinical outcome at 30-days than pre-Rockall score 0.

Conclusions: GBS is superior to pre-Rockall score in identifying patients with suspected UGIB who have a low likelihood of an adverse clinical outcome and can be considered for early discharge. Diagnostic performance at different thresholds suggests that patients with GBS≤2 could be considered for early discharge, doubling the number of eligible patients (15.2 to 32.5%). This has important patient safety and resource implications.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" display_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

References

1. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152(2): 101-13.
2. Marmo R, Koch M, Cipolletta L, et al. Predicting mortality in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeders: validation of the Italian PNED Score and Prospective Comparison with the Rockall Score. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105(6): 1284-91.
3. Van Leerdam ME, Vreeburg EM, Rauws EA, et al. Acute upper GI bleeding: did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98(7): 1494-9.
4. Gleeson F, Clarke E, Lennon J, et al. Outcome of accident and emergency room triaged patients with low risk non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Ir Med J. 2006; 99(4): 114-7.
5. Wallis JP, Wells AW, Chapman CE. Changing indications for red cell transfusion from 2000 to 2004 in the North of England. Transfus. Med. 2006; 16(6): 411-7.
6. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, et al. Incidence of and mortality fromacute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. Steering Committee and members of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. BMJ 1995; 311(6999): 222-6.
7. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, et al. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 1996; 38(3): 316-21.
8. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, et al. Selection of patients for early discharge or outpatient care after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. Lancet 1996; 347(9009): 1138-40.
9. Dalton D, Grant-Casey J, Hearnshaw SA, et al. The UK comparative Audit of Gastrointestinal Bleeding and the use of blood; British Society of Gastroenterology 2007. Available for download at:http://www.bsg.org.uk/pdf_word_docs/blood_audit_report_07.pdf
10. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. Management of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. A National Clinical Guideline September 2008 (Guideline 105).
11. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152(2): 101-13.
12. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 2000; 356(9238): 1318-21.
13. Stanley AJ, Ashley D, Dalton HR, et al. Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation. Lancet 2009; 373(9657): 42-7.
14. Chan JCH, Ayaru L. Analysis of risk scoring for the out-patient management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Frontline Gastroenterology 2011; 2: 19-25.