All Journals from Adam Seccombe
Fluid resuscitation is a widely-used treatment in acute and emergency medicine, however, the process used to perform a fluid assessment has never been studied. This qualitative study explored how acute physicians describe their approach to assessing for fluid resuscitation. 18 clinicians of varying grades consented to a semi-structured interview. Transcripts were coded and analysed using thematic analysis. Participants described three subtypes of assessment; screening assessment, emergency assessment and formal assessment. Whether a patient was ‘sick’ was key to determining which assessment they would receive. Marked heterogeneity was noted in the assessment processes, particularly regarding the use of history-taking. Further research is required to determine how the information gathered in these assessments is used to decide when fluid resuscitation is indicated.
Please subscribe to see more.
Subscribe
Subscribe
Already a member? Log in here
I read the article, ‘Assessment of Fluid responsiveness in the Acute Medical Patient and the Role of Echocardiography’ by Dr Parulekar and Dr Harris with interest. It rightly highlights the challenges posed when assessing for fluid resuscitation in a pressured setting with limited information. This scenario is a routine one for our speciality, which is why it is a concern that the evidence-base outside of intensive care remains limited. Of particular relevance to the Acute Medical specialist, the article acknowledges that performing a focussed-echocardiogram on all acutely-unwell patients is “impractical”. Developing a quick and straightforward approach to fluid resuscitation assessment should be a high research priority for Acute Medicine.