Introduction

Pleural effusion is a common medical condition which often presents on the AMU. There are more than 50 recognised causes of pleural effusion which include diseases local to the pleura or underlying lung, systemic conditions, organ dysfunction and drugs.1 The normal pleural space contains approximately 1mL of fluid. The balance between hydrostatic and oncotic pressures in the visceral and parietal pleural vessels maintains this environment; any disorder affecting this balance will result in a pleural effusion.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" display_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

References

1. Sahn SA, Heffner JE. Pleural fluid analysis. In: Light RW, Lee YCG, eds. Textbook of pleural diseases. 2nd edn. London: Arnold Press, 2008:209e26.w
2. Wang NS. Anatomy of the pleura. Clin Chest Med 1998;19:229e40.
3. Investigation of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline. Thorax 2010; 65(2): i4-i17.
4. Blackmore CC, Black WC, Dallas RV, et al. Pleural fluid volume estimation: a chest radiograph prediction rule. Acad Radiol 1996; 3: 103e9.
5. Yap E, Anderson G, Donald J, et al. Pleural effusion in patients with pulmonary embolism. Respirology 2008; 13: 832e6.
6. National Patient Safety Agency. Risks of chest drain insertion. NPSA/2008/ RRR003, 2008.
7. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline. Thorax, 2010. 65(suppl2): i61-i76.
8. Thoracocentesis. Clinical value, complications, technical problems, and patient experience. Collins TR, Sahn SA Chest. 1987; 91(6): 817-22.
9. Hirsch JH, Rogers JV, Mack LA. Real-time sonography of pleural opacities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 136: 297e301.
10. O’Moore PV, Mueller PR, Simeone JF, et al. Sonographic guidance in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the pleural space. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149: 1e5.
11. Barnes TW, Morgenthaler TI, Olson EJ, et al. Sonographically guided thoracentesis and rate of pneumothorax. J Clin Ultrasound 2005; 33:442e6.
12. Grogan DR, Irwin RS, Channick R, et al. Complications associated with thoracentesis. A prospective randomized study comparing three different methods. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 873e7.
13. Raptopoulos V, Davis LM, Lee G, et al. Factors affecting the development of pneumothorax associated with thoracentesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;156: 917e20.
14. Diacon AH, Brutshe MH, Soler M. Accuracy of pleural puncture sites: a prospective comparison of clinical examination with ultrasound. Chest 2003; 123: 436-441.
15. Faculty of Clinical Radiology. Ultrasound training recommendations for medical and surgical specialities. London: Royal College of Radiologists, 2005.
16. Light RW, MacGreggor I, Luchsinger PC, et al. Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med 1972; 77:507e13.
17. Heffner JE, Brown LK, Barbieri C, et al. Pleural fluid chemical analysis in parapneumonic effusions. A meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151: 1700e8.
18. Good JT Jr, Taryle DA, Maulitz RM, et al. The diagnostic value of pleural fluid pH. Chest 1980; 78: 55e9.
19. Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010.
20. Horsley A, Jones L, White J, et al. Efficacy and complications of smallbore, wire guided chest drains. Chest 2006; 130: 1857e63.
21. Crouch JD, Keagy BA, Delany DJ. “Pigtail” catheter drainage in thoracic surgery. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136: 174e5.
22. Keeling AN, Leong S, Logan PM, et al. Empyema and effusion: outcome of image-guided small-bore catheter drainage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008; 31: 135e41.
23. Gammie JS, Banks MC, Fuhrman CR, et al. The pigtail catheter for pleural drainage: a less invasive alternative to tube thoracostomy. JSLS 1999; 3: 57e61.
24. Jain S, Deoskar RB, Barthwal MS, et al. Study of pigtail catheters for tube thoracostomy. Armed Forces Med J India 2006; 62: 40e1.
25. Clementsen P, Evald T, Grode G, et al. Treatment of malignant pleural effusion: pleurodesis using a small percutaneous catheter. A prospective randomized study. Respir Med 1998; 92: 593e6.
26. Chetty GK, Battula NR, Govindaswamy R, et al. Comparative analysis of the Bonanno catheter and tube thorocostomy in effective aspiration of pleural effusion. Heart Surg Forum 2006; 9: E7314.
27. Chan L, Reilly KM, Henderson C, et al. Complication rates of tube thoracostomy. Am J Emerg Med 1997; 15: 368e70.
28. Falaschi F, Battolla L, Mascalchi M, et al. Usefulness of MR signal intensity in distinguishing benign from malignant pleural disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 166: 963e8.
29. Duysinx B, Nguyen D, Louis R, et al. Evaluation of pleural disease with18- Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging. Chest 2004; 125: 489e93.
30. Bury TH, Paulus P, Dowlati A, et al. Evaluation of pleural disease with FDG-PET imaging: preliminary report. Thorax 1997; 52: 187e9.
31. Venekamp LN, Velkeniers B, Noppen M. Does ‘idiopathic pleuritis’ exist? Natural history of non-specific pleuritis diagnosed after thoracoscopy. Respiration 2005; 72: 74e8.