Abstract

Both hyper and hypovolaemia have been associated with poor outcomes. Assessment of fluid responsiveness is challenging in the acute medical patient, due to time constraints, limited evidence and quite often the lack of accurate assessment tools on the Acute Medicine Unit (AMU). This article explains how focused echo assessment is quick and easy to use for this purpose on the acute medical take and highlights key principles to bear in mind when assessing for hypovolaemia and whether to administer fluid therapy. The increasing familiarity with focused echo such as Focused Intensive Care Echocardiography (FICE) and Point Of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) makes extension of these skill sets to assess for fluid responsiveness a relatively straightforward next step for acute physicians.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" display_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

References

1. Rodriguez RM, Lum-Lung M, Dixon K et al. A prospective study on esophageal Doppler hemodynamic assessment in the ED. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2006; 24, 658 – 663.
2. Longson D, et al. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2013 Intravenous fluid therapy in adult in hospital {Online}. 2013; 174. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg174/evidence/intravenous-fluid-therapy-in-adults-in-hospital-fullguideline-191667997. Accessed on 28/09/2017.
3. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada T et al. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Critical Care Medicine 2011; 39(2):259-265.
4. ProCESS investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA et al. A randomised trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. NEJM 2014;1;370(18):1683-93.
5. The ARISE Investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1496-506
6. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power S et al. Trial of Early, GoalDirected Resuscitation for Septic Shock. NEJM 2015; 372:1301-1311.
7. Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO et al. Mortality after Fluid Bolus in African Children with Severe Infection. NEJM 2011; 364: 2483-2495.
8. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134(1): 172-178.
9. Paonessa JR, Brennan T, Pimentel M et al. Hyperdynamic left ventricular ejection fraction in the intensive care unit. Critical Care 2015; 19:288.
10. Arthur ME, Landolfo C, Wade M, Castresana MR. Inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) measured with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can be used to derive the central venous pressure (CVP) in anesthetized mechanically ventilated patients. Echocardiography. 2009;26(2):140–9.
11. Jue J, Chung W, Schiller NB. Does inferior vena cava size predict right atrial pressures in patients receiving mechanical ventilation? J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1992; 5(6):613–9.
12. Bendjelid K, Romand JA, Walder B, Suter PM, Fournier G. Correlation between measured inferior vena cava diameter and right trial pressure depends on the echocardiographic method used in patients who are mechanically ventilated. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002; 15(9):944–9.
13. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2010; 23: 685–713, quiz 86–8
14. Jabot J, Teboul JL, Richard C et al: Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: importance of the postural change. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:85-90.
15. Caille V, Jabot J, Belliard G et al: Hemodynamic effects of passive leg raising: an echocardiographic study in patients with shock. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:1239-1245.
16. Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, Chemla D et al: Echocardiographic predication of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:1125-1132.
17. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D et al: Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1402-1407.
18. Lafanechere A, Pene F, Goulenok C et al: Changes in aortic blood flow induced by passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 10:132.
19. Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL: Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 121:1245-1252.
20. Mahjoub Y, Touzeau J, Airapetian N, Lorne E, Hijazi M, Zogheib E, Tinturier F, Slama M, Dupont H: The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intraabdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 1824-1829. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eb3c21
21. Monnet X & Teboul J. Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid! Critical Care 2015; 19:18.