Applying a COVID Virtual Ward model, assessing patient outcomes and staff workload

Applying a COVID Virtual Ward model, assessing patient outcomes and staff workload

A COVID virtual ward (CVW) is recommended by NHS England, but ‘usual care’ outcomes have not been reported.
A retrospective study of all adults with COVID-19 attending Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham between 01/06/2020-31/01/2021, assessed against CVW criteria and followed for 28 days.
Of 2301 COVID-19 patients, 571(25%) would have met CVW criteria. Of these, 325(57%) were discharged after review and 246(43%) admitted. Of admitted patients who met CVW criteria, 81% required hospital-supported therapies; 11% died. Of the 325 discharged, 13% re-presented, 9% with COVID-related symptoms, 2% required intensive care admission, and one died (0.3%).
In this comparison, discharging patients without a CVW did not lead to more re-presentations, re-admissions, ITU escalations or deaths compared to published outcomes for hospitals with a CVW.

References

  1. Sapey E, Gallier S, Mainey C, Nightingale P, McNulty D, Corothers H, Evison F, Reeves K, Pagano D, Denniston AK, Nirantharakumar K, Diggle P, Ball S. Ethnicity and risk of death in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 infection in the UK: an observational cohort study in an urban catchment area. BMJ OPen Respiratory Research 2020; doi: bmjresp-2020-000644: 1 - 11.
  2. National Health Service . Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) standard operating procedure: COVID virtual ward. https:// wwwenglandnhsuk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/ sites/52/2021/01/C1042-sop-discharge-covid-virtual-ward-13-jan2pdf2021; DOA 12th May 2021.
  3. Thornton J. The “virtual wards” supporting patients with covid-19 in the community. BMJ 2020; 369: m2119.
  4. Nunan J, Clarke D, Malakouti A, Tannetta D, Calthrop A, Xu XH, Chan NB, Khalil R, Li W, Walden A. Triage Into the Community for COVID-19 (TICC-19) Patients Pathway - Service evaluation of the virtual monitoring of patients with COVID pneumonia. Acute Med 2020; 19: 183 - 191.
  5. Vindrola-Padros C, Sidhu MS, Georghiou T, Sherlaw-Johnson C, Singh KE, Tomini SM, Ellins J, Morris S, Fulop NJ. The implementation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 34: 100799.
  6. Office for National Statistics. Analysis of geographic concentrations of COVID-19 mortality over time, England and Wales: deaths occurring between 22 February and 28 August 2020 Analysis looking at clusters of deaths involving COVID-19 across time and areas in England and Wales. https://wwwonsgovuk/ peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/analysisofgeographicconcentrationsofcovid19mortality overtimeenglandandwales/deathsoccurringbetween22februaryand 28august2020#clusters-of-higher-covid-19-mortality-in-england2021; DOA 12th May 2021.
  7. Atkin C, Kamwa V, Reddy-Kolanu V, Parekh D, Evison F, Nightingale P, Gallier S, Ball S, Sapey E. The changing characteristics of COVID-19 presentations: A regional comparison of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalised patients during the first and second wave.medRxiv 2021: 2021.2002.2007.21251297.
  8. Carver K, Jones N. Compartive accuracy of oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs for diagnosis of COVID-19. Oxford COVID-19 Evidence Service Team Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford 2020; https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/ comparative-accuracy-of-oropharyngeal-and-nasopharyngealswabs-for-diagnosis-of-covid-19/.
  9. NHS England. Guidance and standard operating procedure COVID-19 virus testing in NHS laboratories. NHS England and Improvements 2020; https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/ wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/guidance-and-sop-covid-19- virus-testing-in-nhs-laboratories-v1.pdf.
  10. NHS Digital. The NHS Digital SNOMED CT Browser. https:// termbrowsernhsuk/? 2020; DOA 10.4.2020.
  11. Organisation. WH. ICD-10 online versions. https://wwwwhoint/ classifications/icd/icdonlineversions/en/ 2019; DOA 3.3.2020.
  12. Ministry of Housing Calg. The English Indices of Deprivation 2019 Technical report. https://deraioeacuk/34259/1/IoD2019_Technical_ Reportpdf 2019; DOA 10.4.2020.
  13. Office for National Statistics. Ethnic group, national identity and religion. Measuing equality: a guide for the collection and classification of ethnic group, national identity and religion data in the UK. https://wwwonsgovuk/methodology/classificationsandstandards/easuringequality/ethnicgroupnationalidentityandreligion 2016; DOA 20th March 2020.
  14. Gov.uk. The official UK Government website for data and insights on Coronavirus (COVID-19). https://coronavirusdatagovuk 2020; DOA 27th December 2020.
  15. Martos Perez F, Luque Del Pino J, Jimenez Garcia N, Mora Ruiz E, Asencio Mendez C, Garcia Jimenez JM, Navarro Romero F, Nunez Rodriguez MV. Comorbidity and prognostic factors on admission in a COVID-19 cohort of a general hospital. Rev Clin Esp 2020.
  16. Vindrola-Padros C, Singh KE, Sidhu MS, Georghiou T, SherlawJohnson C, Tomini SM, Inada-Kim M, Kirkham K, Streetly A, Fulop NJ. Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. medRxiv 2021: 2020.2010.2007.20208587.
  17. NHS Arden & GEM CSU. Covid-19 Patient Notification System (CPNS) User Guide. https://wwwenglandnhsuk/statistics/wpcontent/uploads/sites/2/2021/08/CPNS-User-Guide-20210811pdf 2020; DOA 12th July 2021.
  18. Annis T, Pleasants S, Hultman G, Lindemann E, Thompson JA, Billecke S, Badlani S, Melton GB. Rapid implementation of a COVID-19 remote patient monitoring program. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27: 1326 - 1330.
  19. Maghrabi F, Bazaz R, Wilson E, O’Reilly S, Calisti G, Richardson R, Baxter C, Gorsuch T, Khan W, Kane B. S57 The development and implementation of a virtual discharge ward for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: data on the first 300 patients. Thorax 2021; 76: A35.
  20. Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature. 2020;584(7821):430-436. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4
  21. WHO, W. (2020). Report of the WHO-China joint mission on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). WHO-China Jt. Mission Coronavirus Dis, 2019, 16-24

Request Permissions

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center’s (CCC) Marketplace website by clicking the button below:

Get Permission

Applying a COVID Virtual Ward model, assessing patient outcomes and staff workload

22nd January 2022
PMID: 35072383
Authors Affiliations
Suzy Gallier PIONEER Technical Director, Lead for Research Analytics Department of Health Informatics Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Catherine Atkin NIHR Lecturer in Acute Medicine Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham
Vinay Reddy-Kolanu Consultant in Acute Medicine University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Dhruv Parekh Senior Lecturer in Acute Care, Birmingham Acute Care Research Group Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham
Xiaoxu Zou Research Analytics, Health Informatics University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Felicity Evison Senior Research Analysis Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Simon Ball Cheif Medical Officer, Director of Better Care Programme University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Elizabeth Sapey A. PIONEER, The Health Data Research UK Hub in acute care, Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, The University of Birmingham, United Kingdom B. Department of Acute Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn way, Birmingham, West Midlands

Applying a COVID Virtual Ward model, assessing patient outcomes and staff workload

Cite this article as:

Gallier S, Atkin C, Reddy-Kolanu V, Parekh D, Zou X, Evison F, Ball S, Sapey E. Applying a COVID Virtual Ward model, assessing patient outcomes and staff workload. Acute Med. 2021;20(4):266-275. doi: 10.52964/AMJA.0876. PMID: 35072383.

Applying a COVID Virtual Ward model, assessing patient outcomes and staff workload

Share this article

Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.


Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top