A Retrospective Comparison of Emergency Department Throughput Before and After Instituting a Waiting Room Evaluation Process

A Retrospective Comparison of Emergency Department Throughput Before and After Instituting a Waiting Room Evaluation Process

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the healthcare system with emergency department (ED) boarding and workforce shortages. This prompted the need for strategies to evaluate and treat patients while they waited for an ED room.
Objectives: The objective is to describe a waiting room evaluation process and ED throughput in the setting of ED staffing shortages and boarding.
Methods: This is a retrospective before and after cohort study evaluating ED throughput before and after initiation of the assessed waiting room (aWR) process. The aWR process is a joint effort by emergency clinicians and ancillary staff to evaluate and treat patients in the ED waiting room when no ED bed is available. Throughput data 6 months before and 6 months after institution of aWR was collected and analyzed.
Results: The arrival to provider time and the number of patients who left without being seen (LWBS) decreased with initiation of the aWR process. The remainder of throughput metrics remained unchanged. There was more ED boarding at Wisconsin sites during the aWR process period.
Conclusions: The aWR process may minimize LWBS and improve arrival to provider time in the setting of staff shortages and more ED boarders. It may help other ED throughput metrics although numerous confounding factors make it difficult to make definitive conclusions. This process may be trialed during times of challenging healthcare landscape, such as pandemic conditions and with workforce shortages.

Request Permissions

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center’s (CCC) Marketplace website by clicking the button below:

Get Permission

A Retrospective Comparison of Emergency Department Throughput Before and After Instituting a Waiting Room Evaluation Process

6th November 2024
PMID: 39513261
Authors Affiliations
John Teijido MD, Emergency Medicine Specialists, S. C. 10625 West North Avenue, Suite 102 Wauwatosa, WI 53226 United States of America Ascension 101 South Hanley Rd., Suite 450 St. Louis, MO 63105 United States of America
Benjamin Blackwood MD, Emergency Medicine Residency Program Eastern Virginia Medical School 600 Gresham Dr, Raleigh Building – Room 304 Norfolk, Virginia 23507 United States of America, Emergency Physicians of Tidewater, PLC 6379 Center Drive Norfolk, VA 23502
Barry Knapp MD, Emergency Medicine Residency Program Eastern Virginia Medical School 600 Gresham Dr, Raleigh Building – Room 304 Norfolk, Virginia 23507 United States of America, Emergency Physicians of Tidewater, PLC 6379 Center Drive Norfolk, VA 23502
Laura Strojny DO, Emergency Medicine Residency Program Eastern Virginia Medical School 600 Gresham Dr, Raleigh Building – Room 304 Norfolk, Virginia 23507 United States of America, Emergency Physicians of Tidewater, PLC 6379 Center Drive Norfolk, VA 23502

A Retrospective Comparison of Emergency Department Throughput Before and After Instituting a Waiting Room Evaluation Process

Cite this article as:

Teijido J, Blackwood B, Knapp B, Strojny L. A Retrospective Comparison of Emergency Department Throughput Before and After Instituting a Waiting Room Evaluation Process. Acute Med. 2024;23(3):127-131. doi: 10.52964/AMJA.0987. PMID: 39513261.

A Retrospective Comparison of Emergency Department Throughput Before and After Instituting a Waiting Room Evaluation Process

Share this article

Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.


Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top