Assessing the performance of the four question abbreviated mental test in the acute geriatric setting

Assessing the performance of the four question abbreviated mental test in the acute geriatric setting

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment is common amongst acute geriatric hospital admissions but detection is often poor and this is associated with worse outcomes. The four-question abbreviated mental test (AMT4) has previously been promoted nationally in the acute setting as a succinct assessment tool. However, a recent national dementia Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) goal recommends a single screening question followed by the tenquestion abbreviated mental test (AMT10). We aimed to evaluate the negative predictive value of the AMT4 within the acute setting by comparing it to three other validated tools.

Methods: We identified 100 acute medical admissions (>60 years old) with a negative AMT4 and administered the AMT10, six-item cognitive impairment test (6CIT) and confusion assessment method (CAM) within 24 hours of admission.

Results: Forty-six percent of the participants scored positively on at least one of the additional tests despite a negative AMT4. Forty-four patients had a positive 6CIT, 23 had a positive AMT10 and six had a positive CAM. Using the 6CIT as a diagnostic standard, tests of short-term memory had the greatest sensitivity and specificity for cognitive impairment.

Conclusions: Nearly half of the participants had signs of cognitive impairment despite a negative AMT4. Consequently, there is a risk of under diagnosis with potentially serious consequences for morbidity and mortality. Tests of shortterm memory were strongly associated with cognitive impairment. We propose the addition of such a test in order to increase the sensitivity of the AMT4 without compromising its brevity and utility in the acute setting.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" display_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

References

  1. Department of Health. Using the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) payment framework: Guidance on new national goals for 2012-13. 2012 [cited 2013 19 Jan]: Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_ digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_133859.pdf.
  2. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision. 2010 [cited 2012 21 Jul]: Available from: http://apps.who.int/ classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en.
  3. Collins N, Blanchard MR, Tookman A, et al. Detection of delirium in the acute hospital. Age Ageing 2010; 39(1): 131-5.
  4. Laurila JV, Pitkala KH, Strandberg TE, et al. Detection and documentation of dementia and delirium in acute geriatric wards. Gen Hosp Psych 2004; 26(1): 31-5.
  5. Siddiqi N, House AO, Holmes JD. Occurrence and outcome of delirium in medical in-patients: a systematic literature review. Age Ageing 2006;35(4): 350-64.
  6. Sampson EL, Blanchard MR, Jones L, et al. Dementia in the acute hospital: prospective cohort study of prevalence and mortality. Br J Psychiatry 2009; 195(1): 61-6.
  7. Akunne A, Murthy L, Young J. Cost-effectiveness of multicomponent interventions to prevent delirium in older people admitted to medical wards. Age Ageing 2012; 41(3): 285-91.
  8. Witlox J, Eurelings LSM, de Jonghe JFM, et al. Delirium in Elderly Patients and the Risk of Postdischarge Mortality, Institutionalization, and Dementia. JAMA 2010; 304(4): 443-51.
  9. Lakey L. Counting the cost: Caring for people with dementia on hospital wards. London: Alzheimer’s Society; 2009 [cited 2012 21 Jul]. Available from: http://alzheimers.org.uk/countingthecost/.
  10. Joray S, Wietlisbach V, Bula CJ. Cognitive impairment in elderly medical inpatients: detection and associated six-month outcomes. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 12(6): 639-47.
  11. The Royal College of Psychiatrists. Who cares wins: Improving the outcome for older people admitted to the general hospital: Guidelines for the development of Liaison Mental Health Services for older people. London;2005 [cited 2012 22 Jul]. Available from: http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/PDF/WhoCaresWins.pdf.
  12. Department of Health. Urgent care pathways for older people with complex needs: Best practice guidance. London 2007.
  13. Hodkinson MM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing 1972; 1: 233-8.
  14. Brooke P, Bullock R. Validation of a 6 item cognitive impairment test with a view to primary care usage. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999; 14(11): 936-40.
  15. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, et al. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113(12): 941-8.
  16. Jitapunkul S, Pillay I, Ebrahim S. The abbreviated mental test: its use and validity. Age Ageing 1991; 20(5): 332-6.
  17. Holmes J, Gilbody S. Differences in use of abbreviated mental test score by geriatricians and psychiatrists. BMJ 1996; 313(7055): 465.
  18. Swain DG, Nightingale PG. Evaluation of a shortened version of the Abbreviated Mental Test in a series of elderly patients. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11(3): 243-8.
  19. Swain DG, O’Brien AG, Nightingale PG. Cognitive assessment in elderly patients admitted to hospital: the relationship between the shortened version of the Abbreviated Mental Test and the Abbreviated Mental Test and Mini-Mental State Examination. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14(6): 608-10.
  20. Schofield I, Stott DJ, Tolson D, et al. Screening for cognitive impairment in older people attending accident and emergency using the 4-item Abbreviated Mental Test. Eur J Emerg Med. 2010; 17(6): 340-2.
  21. Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, et al. The Confusion Assessment Method: A Systematic Review of Current Usage. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56(5): 823-30.
  22. National Institue for Health and Clinical Excellence. Delirium: diagnosis, prevention and management (CG103). London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2010.
  23. Tuijl JP, Scholte EM, de Craen AJM, et al. Screening for cognitive impairment in older general hospital patients: comparison of the Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test with the Mini-Mental State Examination. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 27(7): 755-62.
  24. MacKenzie DM, Copp P, Shaw RJ, et al. Brief cognitive screening of the elderly: a comparison of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and Mental Status Questionnaire (MSQ). Psychol Med. 1996; 26(2): 427-30.
  25. Woodford HJ, George J. Cognitive assessment in the elderly: a review of clinical methods. QJM 2007; 100(8): 469-84.
  26. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, et al. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA 1993; 269(18): 2386-91.

Request Permissions

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center’s (CCC) Marketplace website by clicking the button below:

Get Permission

Assessing the performance of the four question abbreviated mental test in the acute geriatric setting

8th March 2016
Authors Affiliations
Thomas Locke MBChB, BSc, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, UK
Sally Keat MBChB, BMedSci Chesterfield Royal Hospital, UK
Matthew Tate MBChB, DTM&H i.e. MBChB, DTM&H Sheffield Teaching Hospitals UK
Alexander Bown MBChB General Practice, Aberdeen, North of Scotland Region of NHS Education for Scotland, UK
Robin Ghosh Consultant in Geriatric Medicine Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, UK
Anthony Hart Consultant in Paediatric Neurology, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, UK

Assessing the performance of the four question abbreviated mental test in the acute geriatric setting

Cite this article as:

No PMID provided!

Assessing the performance of the four question abbreviated mental test in the acute geriatric setting

Share this article

Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.


Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top