Abstract

Acute ambulatory care is a critical component of the emergency care pathway with national policy support and a dedicated NHS Improvement network. The evidence base for treating acute medical illness outside hospital is a diverse mix of randomised and observational studies with varying inclusion criteria, prognostic stratification, interventions and healthcare setting which limits synthesis of all available evidence and translation to the UK context. There is little consensus on the level of risk for home-based treatment for acute medical illness. Selection tools for referral to acute ambulatory care have been developed but there is limited evidence for their use. There are still research questions concerning optimal staffing, referral mechanisms, point of care diagnostic portfolio and tools for shared decision making.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" display_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

References

1. Ewbank L, Thompson J, McKenna H. NHS hospital bed numbers: past, present, future. London: UK: The King’s Fund, 2017.
2. Monitor. Improving patient flow: evidence to help local decision makers. London: UK: Department of Health, 2015.
3. NHS England. Bed availability and occupancy time series. 2017. Future Hospital Commission.
4. Future hospital: caring for medical patients. A report from the Future Hospital Commission to the Royal College of Physicians. London, 2013
5. NHS England. Five Year Forward View: NHS England, 2014
6. NHS Improvement. National priorities for acute hospitals 2017. Good practice guide: focus on patient flow 2017 [Available from:
   https:// improvement.nhs.uk/resources/good-practice-guidefocus-on-improving-patient-flow/.
7. Krumholz HM. Post-hospital syndrome--an acquired, transient condition of generalized risk. The New England journal of medicine 2013;368(2):100-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1212324 [published Online First: 2013/01/11]
8. Hamad M, Connolly VM. Ambulatory emergency care - improvement by design. Clinical medicine (London, England) 2018;18(1):69-74. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-1-69 [published Online First: 2018/02/14]
9. Conley J, O’Brien CW, Leff BA, et al. Alternative Strategies to Inpatient Hospitalization for Acute Medical Conditions: A Systematic Review. JAMA internal medicine 2016;176(11):1693-702. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5974 [published Online First: 2016/10/04]
10. Caplan GA, Sulaiman NS, Mangin DA, et al. A meta-analysis of “hospital in the home”. The Medical journal of Australia 2012;197(9):512-9. [published Online First: 2012/11/06]
11. Gupta S, Sukhal S, Agarwal R, et al. Quick diagnosis units--an effective alternative to hospitalization for diagnostic workup: a systematic review. Journal of hospital medicine 2014;9(1):54-9. doi:10.1002/jhm.2129 [published Online First: 2013/12/11]
12. Piran S, Le Gal G, Wells PS, et al. Outpatient treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Thrombosis research 2013;132(5):515-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.012 [published Online First: 2013/09/17]
13. Chalmers JD, Akram AR, Hill AT. Increasing outpatient treatment of mild community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis. The European respiratory journal 2011;37(4):858- doi: 10.1183/09031936.00065610 [published Online First: 2010/08/24]
14. Galipeau J, Pussegoda K, Stevens A, et al. Effectiveness and safety of short-stay units in the emergency department: a systematic review. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2015;22(8):893-907. doi: 10.1111/ acem.12730 [published Online First: 2015/07/24]
15. Goodacre SW. Should we establish chest pain observation units in the UK? A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature. Journal of accident & emergency medicine 2000;17(1):1-6. [published Online First: 2000/02/05]
16. Federman AD, Soones T, DeCherrie LV, et al. Association of a Bundled Hospital-at-Home and 30-Day Postacute Transitional Care Program With Clinical Outcomes and Patient Experiences. JAMA internal medicine 2018 doi: 10.1001/ jamainternmed.2018.2562 [published Online First: 2018/06/28]
17. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation. London: UK: NICE, 2018.
18. Anglemyer A, Horvath HT, Bero L. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014(4):Mr000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2 [published Online First: 2014/05/02]
19. Madsen F, Ladelund S, Linneberg A. High levels of bed occupancy associated with increased inpatient and thirty-day hospital mortality in Denmark. Health affairs (Project Hope) 2014;33(7):1236-44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1303 [published Online First: 2014/07/10]
20. Beckett DJ, Spears M, Thomson E. Reliable consultant level data from an acute medical unit: a powerful tool for improvement. The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 2018;48:101 - 13.
21. Franks P, Williams GC, Zwanziger J, et al. Why do physicians vary so widely in their referral rates? Journal of general internal medicine 2000;15(3):163-8. [published Online First: 2000/03/16]
22. Rossdale M, Kemple T, Payne S, et al. An observational study of variation in GPs’ out-of-hours emergency referrals. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 2007;57(535):152-4. [published Online First: 2007/02/01]
23. Jimenez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Archives of internal medicine 2010;170(15):1383-9. doi: 10.1001/ archinternmed.2010.199 [published Online First: 2010/08/11]
24. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax 2003;58(5):377-82. [published Online First: 2003/05/03]
25. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pneumonia in adults: diagnosis and management. London: UK: NICE, 2014.
26. Stanley AJ, Ashley D, Dalton HR, et al. Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation. Lancet (London, England) 2009;373(9657):42-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140- 6736(08)61769-9 [published Online First: 2008/12/19]
27. Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, et al. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2013;78(4):576-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.003 [published Online First: 2013/06/25]
28. Chatten K, Purssell H, Banerjee AK, et al. Glasgow Blatchford Score and risk stratifications in acute upper gastrointestinal bleed: can we extend this to 2 for urgent outpatient management? Clinical medicine (London, England) 2018;18(2):118-22. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-118 [published Online First: 2018/04/08]
29. O’Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health affairs (Project Hope) 2004;Suppl Variation:Var63-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.63 [published Online First: 2004/10/09]
30. Hess EP, Hollander JE, Schaffer JT, et al. Shared decision making in patients with low risk chest pain: prospective randomized pragmatic trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2016;355:i6165. doi:10.1136/bmj.i6165 [published Online First: 2016/12/07]
31. Purdy S, Griffin T, Salisbury C, et al. Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians. Public health 2009;123(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.11.001 [published Online First: 2009/01/16]
32. Royal College of Physicians. Acute Care Toolkit 10: Ambulatory Emergency Care 2015 [Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/ guidelines-policy/acute-care-toolkit-10-ambulatoryemergency-care
33. Ala L, Mack J, Shaw R, et al. Selecting ambulatory emergency care (AEC) patients from the medical emergency in-take: the derivation and validation of the Amb score. Clinical medicine (London, England) 2012;12(5):420-6. [published Online First: 2012/10/30]
34. Cameron A, Rodgers K, Ireland A, et al. A simple tool to predict admission at the time of triage. Emergency medicine journal: EMJ 2015;32(3):174-9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203200 [published Online First: 2014/01/15]
35. Thompson A, Wennike N. Testing the AMB score - can it distinguish patients who are suitable for ambulatory care? Clinical medicine (London, England) 2015;15(3):222-4. doi: 10.7861/ clinmedicine.15-3-222 [published Online First: 2015/06/03]
36. Cameron A, Jones D, Logan E, et al. Comparison of Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and Amb Score in predicting need for inpatient care. Emergency medicine journal: EMJ 2018;35(4):247-doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207246 [published Online First: 2018/02/16]
37. Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, et al. Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2009;338:b606. doi:10.1136/bmj.b606 [published Online First: 2009/06/09]
38. Teuffel O, Ethier MC, Alibhai SM, et al. Outpatient management of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 2011;22(11):2358-65. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq745 [published Online First: 2011/03/03]
39. Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB, et al. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: A multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2000;18(16):3038-51. doi:10.1200/jco.2000.18.16.3038 [published Online First: 2000/08/16]
40. Cooksley T, Campbell G, Al-Sayed T, et al. A novel approach to improving ambulatory outpatient management of low risk febrile neutropenia: an Enhanced Supportive Care (ESC) clinic. Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 2018 doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4194-1 [published Online First: 2018/04/21]
41. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines: Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2011;64(12):1277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011 [published Online First: 2011/08/02]
42. Aujesky D, Roy PM, Verschuren F, et al. Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England) 2011;378(9785):41-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60824-6 [published Online First: 2011/06/28]
43. Fermann GJ, Erkens PM, Prins MH, et al. Treatment of pulmonary embolism with rivaroxaban: outcomes by simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score from a post hoc analysis of the EINSTEIN PE study. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2015;22(3):299-307. doi:10.1111/acem.12615 [published Online First: 2015/02/27]
44. Yoo HH, Queluz TH, El Dib R. Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014(11):Cd010019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010019.pub2 [published Online First: 2014/11/21] British Thoracic Society.
45. BRITISH THORACIC SOCIETY GUIDELINE FOR THE INITIAL OUTPATIENT MANAGEMENT OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM. Thorax 2018;73(Supplement 2)
46. NHS Improvement. Ambulatory Emergency Care Directory, 2018.
47. Piper D, Iedema R, Gray J, et al. Utilizing experience-based codesign to improve the experience of patients accessing emergency departments in New South Wales public hospitals: an evaluation study. Health services management research 2012;25(4):162-72. doi:10.1177/0951484812474247 [published Online First: 2013/04/05]
48. AEC Network. Ambulatory Emergency Care: A Safe and Proven Approach to Resolve Emergency Care Challenges: NHS Improvement, 2014.
49. Camm CF, Hayward G, Elias TCN, et al. Sepsis recognition tools in acute ambulatory care: associations with process of care and clinical outcomes in a service evaluation of an Emergency Multidisciplinary Unit in Oxfordshire. BMJ open 2018;8(4):e020497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020497 [published Online First: 2018/04/11]
50. Ellis G, Whitehead MA, O’Neill D, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011(7):Cd006211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub2 [published Online First: 2011/07/08]