Abstract

Pulmonary Embolism is a common cardiopulmonary illness with an age and sex adjusted incidence of around 117 cases per 100 000 person years. The clinical presentation is extremely heterogeneous and non specific. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism are well established. When combined with presenting features and investigations. a multimodality algorithm has led to significant changes in the diagnostic approach of suspected PE. While the best combination of tests for any individual patient remains the subject of controversy this article aims to rationalise the acute physician’s approach to diagnosis and use of available investigations.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" dipslay_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

References

1. Heit JA. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the community: implications for prevention and management. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2006; 21: 23–9.
2. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet 1999; 353: 1386–9.
3. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, Maıˆtre S, Girard P, Leroyer C, et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lance. 2002; 360: 1914–20.
4. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 2003; 58: 470–83.
5. Goldhaber SZ. Echocardiography in the management of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 691–700.
6. Moser, KM. Venous thromboembolism. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141: 235.
7. Itti E, Nguyen S, Robin F, et al. Distribution of ventilation/perfusion ratios in pulmonary embolism: an adjunct to the interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans. J Nucl Med 2002; 43: 1596–602.
8. Ferrari E, Imbert A, Chevalier T, et al. The ECG in pulmonary embolism. Predictive value of negative T waves in precordial leads: 80 case reports. Chest 1997; 111: 537–43.
9. Afzal A, Noor HA, Gill SA, et al. Leukocytosis in acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 1999; 115: 1329–32.
10. Prediletto R, Miniati M, Tonelli L, et al. Diagnostic value of gas exchange tests in patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism. Crit Care 1999; 3: 111–6.
11. Elliott CG, Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, et al. Chest radiographs in acute pulmonary embolism. Results from the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry. Chest 2000; 118: 33–8.
12. Rodger M, Carrier M, Jones G, et al. Diagnostic value of arterial blood gas measurement in suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 2105–8.
13. Rodger M, Makropoulos D, Turek M, et al. Diagnostic value of the electrocardiogram in suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 807–9.
14. Stein PD, Afzal A, Henry JW, et al. Fever in acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 2000; 117: 39–42.
15. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 997–1005.
16. Weinmann, EE, Salzman, EW. Deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1630.
17. Monreal, M, Lafoz, E, Casals, A, et al. Occult cancer in patients with deep venous thrombosis. Cancer 1991; 67: 541.
18. Prandoni, P, Lensing, AW, Buller, HR, et al. Deep-vein thrombosis and the incidence of subsequent symptomatic cancer. N Engl J Med 1992: 327: 1128.
19. Monreal, M, Fernandez-Llamazares, J, Perandreu, J, et al. Occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism: Which patients, which cancers. Thromb Haemost 1997; 78: 1316.
20. Cornuz J, Pearson SD, Creager MA, et al. Importance of findings on the initial evaluation for cancer in patients with symptomatic idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 785–93.
21. Hettiarachchi RJ, Lok J, Prins MH, et al. Undiagnosed malignancy in patients with deep vein thrombosis: incidence, risk indicators, and diagnosis. Cancer 1998; 83: 180–5.
22. Sorensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Olsen JH, et al. Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1846–50.
23. Stein, PD, Terrin, ML, Hales, CA, et al. Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest 1991; 100: 598.
24. Miniati M, Prediletto R, Formichi B, et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 864–71.
25. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators. JAMA 1990; 263: 2753.
26. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Stiell I, Dreyer JF, Barnes D, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 98–107.
27. Perrier A, Roy PM, Aujesky D, Chagnon I, Howarth N, Gourdier AL, et al. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med 2004; 116: 291–9.
28. Perrier A, Miron MJ, Desmarais S, et al. Using clinical evaluation and lung scan to rule out suspected pulmonary embolism: is it a valid option in patients with normal results of lower-limb venous compression ultrasonography? Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 512–6.
29. Righini M, Goehring C, Bounameaux H, et al. Effects of age on the performance of common diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2000; 109: 357–61.
30. Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D, et al. Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2002; 113: 269–75.
31. Leclercq MG, Lutisan JG, van Marwijk Kooy M, et al. Ruling out clinically suspected pulmonary embolism by assessment of clinical probability and D-dimer levels: a management study. Thromb Haemost 2003; 89: 97–103.
32. Sanson BJ, Lijmer JG, Mac Gillavry MR, et al. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 199–203.
33. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 416–20.
34. Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF, et al. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern; 161: 92–7.
35. Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 165–71.
36. Van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV, Huisman PM, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, Kramer MH, Kruip MJ, Kwakkel-van Erp JM, Leebeek FW, Nijkeuter M, Prins MH, Sohne M, Tick LW. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 2006; 295: 172–9.
37. Rodger, M, Makropoulos, D, Turek, M, et al. Diagnostic value of the electrocardiogram in suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 807.
38. Geibel, A, Zehender, M, Kasper, W, et al. Prognostic value of the ECG on admission in patients with acute major pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 2005; 25: 843.
39. Ferrari, E, Imbert, A, Chevalier, T, et al. The ECG in pulmonary embolism. Predictive value of negative T waves in precordial leads--80 case reports. Chest 1997; 111: 537.
40. Kline, JA, Hernandez-Nino, J, Newgard, CD, et al. Use of pulse oximetry to predict in-hospital complications in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2003; 115: 203.
41. Ginsberg, JS, Wells, PS, Kearon, C, et al Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid whole-blood assay for d-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129, 1006–11.
42. Perrier, A, Desmarais, S, Miron, M, et al Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 1999; 353, 190–5.
43. Kelly, J, Hunt, BJ A clinical probability assessment and d-dimer measurement should be the initial step in the investigation of suspected venous thromboembolism. Chest 2003; 124, 1116–19.
44. De Monye, W, Sanson, BJ, Mac Gillavry, MR, et al. Embolus location affects the sensitivity of a rapid quantitative D-dimer assay in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 345.
45. Van Beek EJR, Brouwers EMJ, Song B, et al. Lung scintigraphy and helical computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Clin Appl Thromb Hems 2001; 7: 87–92.
46. Hartmann I, Hagen P, Melissant C, et al. Diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism: effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on the performance of D-dimer testing, ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, spiral computed tomographic angiography, and conventional angiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 2232–7.
47. Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Muller NL, et al. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 1997; 205: 447–52.
48. Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, et al. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning – correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Radiology 1998; 208: 201–8.
49. Van Rossum AB, Pattynama PM, Mallens WM, et al. Can helical CT replace scintigraphy in the diagnostic process in suspected pulmonary embolism? A retrolective-prolective cohort study focusing on total diagnostic yield. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 90–6.
50. Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK, Crispin A, Hong C, Becker CR, Reiser MF. Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 2002; 222: 483–90.
51. Van Rossum AB, van Erkel AR, van Persijn van Meerten EL, et al. Accuracy of helical CT for acute pulmonary embolism: ROC analysis of observer performance related to clinical experience. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1160–4.
52. Domingo ML, Marti-Bonmati L, Dosda R, et al. Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with helical CT. Eur J Radiol 2000; 34: 136–40.
53. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Baghaie F, et al. Clinical value of thin collimation in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 407–11.
54. Perrier A, Howarth N, Didier D, et al. Performance of helical computedtomography in unselected outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 88–97.
55. Ghuysen A, Ghaye B, Willems V et al. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and prognostic significance in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 2005; 60: 956–61.
56. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2317–27.
57. Turkstra F, Kuijer PM, van Beek EJ, et al. Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography of leg veins in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 775–81.
58. MacGillavry M, Sanson B, Buller H, et al. Compression ultrasonography of the leg veins in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is a more extensive assessment of compressibility useful? Thromb Haemost 2000; 84: 973–6.
59. Kelley, MA, Carson, JL, Palevsky, HI, Schwartz, JS. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: New facts and strategies. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 300.
60. Hull, RD, Raskob, GE, Coates, G, et al. A new noninvasive management strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 2549.
61. Kucher N, Rossi E, De Rosa M, Goldhaber SZ. Prognostic role of echocardiography among patients with acute pulmonary embolism and a systolic arterial pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165: 1777–81.
62. Come, PC. Echocardiographic evaluation of pulmonary embolism and its response to therapeutic interventions. Chest 1992; 101: 151S.
63. Grifoni, S, Olivotto, I, Cecchini, P, et al. Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2000; 101.
64. Ferrari E, Baudouy M, Cerboni P, et al. Clinical epidemiology of venous thromboembolic disease. Results of a French Multicentre Registry. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 685–91.
65. Kasper W, Konstantinides S, Geibel A, et al. Prognostic significance of right ventricular afterload stress detected by echocardiography in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Heart 1997; 77: 346–9.
66. Giannitsis, E, Muller-Bardorff, M, Kurowski, V, et al. Independent prognostic value of cardiac troponin T in patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism. Circulation 2000; 102: 211.
67. Janata, K, Holzer, M, Laggner, AN, Mullner, M. Cardiac troponin T in the severity assessment of patients with pulmonary embolism: cohort study. BMJ 2003; 326: 312.
68. Yalamanchili, K, Sukhija, R, Aronow, WS, et al. Prevalence of increased cardiac troponin I levels in patients with and without acute pulmonary embolism and relation of increased cardiac troponin I levels with inhospital mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 263.
69. Scridon, T, Scridon, C, Skali, H, et al. Prognostic significance of troponin elevation and right ventricular enlargement in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 303.
70. Kostrubiec M, Pruszczyk, Bochowicz A, et al. Biomarker-based risk assessment model in acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2005: 26: 2166–72.
71. Gupta A, Frazer CK, Ferguson JM, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 210: 353–9.
72. Spuentrup, E, Katoh, M, Wiethoff, AJ, et al. Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pulmonary Emboli with a Fibrin-specific Contrast Agent. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172: 494.
73. Miniati, M, Bottai, M, Monti, S. Comparison of 3 clinical models for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism. Medicine (Baltimore) 2005; 84: 107.
74. Roy, PM, Colombet, I, Durieux, P, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. BMJ 2005; 331: 259.
75. Kucher, N, Goldhaber, SZ. Management of massive pulmonary embolism. Circulation 2005; 112: e28,
76. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Task Force on Pulmonary Embolism, European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21: 1301–36.
77. Coon, WW, Willis, PW. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: Prediction, prevention and treatment. Am J Cardiol 1959; 4: 611.
78. Soloff, LA, Rodman, T. Acute pulmonary embolism. II. Clinical. Am Heart J 1967; 74: 829.