follow-up

Variability in Anticoagulation Duration and Follow-up for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Ambulatory Care

Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is commonly managed in ambulatory care. Guidelines recommend reassessment at three months to review anticoagulation duration, but no structured follow-up pathway exists within our Trust.
Aim: To evaluate anticoagulation duration, follow-up practices, and outcomes in patients with DVT diagnosed in ambulatory care.
Methods: Retrospective, observational service evaluation across two ambulatory care units in Manchester, UK. Patients with confirmed lower limb DVT were identified between January 2023 and June 2023. Data were collected from electronic patient records including complication rates over a 2-year period.
Results: Of 307 patients assessed for suspected DVT, 90 had confirmed DVT. Most cases were unprovoked (77.8%). At discharge, 39% were prescribed 3 months’ anticoagulation, 31% 6 months, 11% lifelong, 6% received a duration range of 3-6 months, and 13% had no specified duration. Discrepancies between recommendation at discharge and primary care prescribing were seen in 53%, with nearly half receiving longer treatment. 20% had secondary care follow-up. Recurrent DVT occurred in nine patients, none of whom had received follow-up; no recurrences were seen in the followed-up group, although this difference was not statistically significant (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.195). Bleeding events were seen in 4.4% of cases and were minor.
Conclusions: There is substantial variability in anticoagulation management following DVT in ambulatory care. Although recurrence was not observed in the followed-up group, the study was not powered to detect differences, and this finding should be interpreted cautiously. Further work is needed to establish if a follow-up DVT clinic will improve patient outcomes.

Please subscribe to see more.
Subscribe
Already a member? Log in here

Variability in Anticoagulation Duration and Follow-up for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Ambulatory Care Read More

General medical follow-up clinics – does the traditional model need to be updated for new traditional model need to be updated for new acute physicians?

Abstract

The follow up arrangements were reviewed for 212 patients discharged from our Medical Admissions Unit (MAU) prior to the appointment of an acute medical consultant. 19 patients (9%) were referred to speciality clinics, with only 1 patient being followed-up in a ‘general’ medical clinic; the patient’s GP was requested to follow up the majority of the outstanding results. Based on these results there appears little need or acute medical consultants to undertake ‘traditional’ outpatient follow-up clinics. Acute medical clinics may have other roles in enabling admission avoidance and reducing length of hospital stay.

Please subscribe to see more.
Subscribe
Already a member? Log in here

General medical follow-up clinics – does the traditional model need to be updated for new traditional model need to be updated for new acute physicians? Read More

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top