Abstract

Background: Recently a very simple, easy to remember early warning score (EWS) dubbed TOTAL has been reported. The score was derived from 309 acutely ill medical patients admitted to a Malawian hospital and awards one point for Tachypnea >30 breaths per minute, one point for Oxygen saturation <90%, two points for a Temperature <35°C, one point for Altered mental status, and one point for Loss of independence as indicated by the inability to stand or walk without help. TOTAL has an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for death within 72 hours of 78%.

Methods: We compared the performance of the TOTAL score in 849 medical patients attending a resource poor hospital in Uganda and 2935 patients admitted to a small rural hospital in Ireland.

Results: TOTAL’s AUROC for death within 24 hours was the same in both hospital populations: 85.1% (95% CI 78.6 – 91.6%) for Kitovu Hospital patients and 84.7% (95% CI 77.1 – 92.2%) for Nenagh Hospital patients.

Conclusion: The discrimination of TOTAL is exactly the same in elderly Irish patients as it is in young African patients. The score is easy to remember, easy to calculate, and works over a broad range of patients.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" display_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

References

1. Morgan RJ, Williams F, Wright MM. An early warning scoring system for detecting developing critical illness. Clin Intens Care 1997; 8: 100.
2. Prytherch DR, Smith GB, Schmidt PE, et al. ViEWS—towards a national early warning score for detecting adult inpatient deterioration. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 932–7.
3. Bleyer AJ, Vidya S, Russell G.B, et al. Longitudinal analysis of one million vital signs in patients in an academic medical center. Resuscitation. 2011; 82(11): 1387–1392.
4. Opio MO, Nansubuga G, Kellett J. Validation of the VitalPAC™ Early Warning Score (ViEWS) in acutely ill medical patients attending a resource-poor hospital in subSaharan Africa. Resuscitation (2013), doi.org/10.1016/j. resuscitation.2013.02.007.
5. Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS): standardising the assessment of acute illness severity in the NHS. Report of a working party. London: RCP; 2012. .
6. Prytherch D, Smith GB, Schmidt P, et al. Calculating early warning scores—a classroom comparison of pen and paper and hand-held computer methods. Resuscitation 2006; 70: 173–8.
7. Wheeler I, Price C, Sitch A, et al. (2013) Early Warning Scores Generated in Developed Healthcare Settings Are Not Sufficient at Predicting Early Mortality in Blantyre, Malawi: A Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 8(3): e59830. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0059830.
8. Hickey A., Gleeson M, Kellett J. READS: the Rapid Electronic Assessment Documentation System. British Journal of Nursing, 2012; 21: 1333–1339.
9. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839–43.
10. Rylance J, Baker T, Mushi E, et al. Use of an early warning score and ability to walk predicts mortality in medical patients admitted to hospitals in Tanzania. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2009; 103: 790–794.
11. Wallis PA, Gottschalk SB, Wood D, et al. The Cape Triage Score — a triage system for South Africa. S Afr Med J 2006; 96: 53–6.
12. Wallis LA, Balfour CH. Triage in emergency departments. S Afr Med J 2007; 97: 13.
13. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Schmidt PE, et al. Review and performance evaluation of aggregate weighted “track and trigger” systems. Resuscitation 2008; 79: 11–21.