Editorials

Editorials

EDITORIAL VOLUME 19 ISSUE 4: COVID-19: Exemplifying the importance and challenges of Acute Medicine

Editorials, Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 173 – 252 (2020)

COVID-19 has challenged healthcare providers and systems. It has dominated the international news agenda for the majority of 2020; arguably opinion becoming more fractured and disparate as the pandemic has evolved. The changing tone of discourse is concerning, although perhaps not surprising. As the majority of the population become increasingly baffled, bored and betrayed desperate for their lives return to “normal”, progressively binary, toxically expressed and opposing scientific views as to how to manage the “second wave” of the pandemic permeate. The initial failings of personal protective equipment (PPE) and a lack of preparedness to face a viral pandemic against the background of a strained acute care sector must not be forgotten and lessons learned.

In the UK, COVID-19 has highlighted both the challenges and importance of Acute Medicine. Acute Medicine teams have provided innovative and rapidly adaptive models of care in response to the pandemic. The fundamental tenets of Acute Medicine – MDT working, rapid initiation of treatment, sound use of diagnostics, early senior clinician input and recognition of those in whom ambulatory care is appropriate – are essential components in the management of all acute medical care and demonstrably equally apply to COVID-19. Our increasing global community of Acute Physicians and Acute Medicine teams have once again demonstrated the importance of our specialty.

The innovative practice of Acute Medicine teams and the impact of COVID-19 features prominently in this issue of Acute Medicine. There has been wide commentary regarding the impact of COVID-19 on both mental health issues and non-COVID-19 presentations. Riley et al. report an important analysis of presentations to AMU during the first wave of COVID-19 demonstrating a significant change in patient case mix.1 There were increased numbers of presentations potentially associated with social isolation such as falls, alcohol-related pathologies and overdoses alongside smaller numbers of traditionally lower risk presentations, such as non-cardiac chest pain.

Ambulatory management of low risk patients with suspected COVID-19 is fundamental to the safety and sustainability of acute care services during the “second wave” and moving forward. Nunan et al. report the experience of the TICC-19 – a virtual ward monitoring oxygen saturations for COVID-19 triaged using a 30 metre rapid walk test.2 This strategy appears safe and feasible with high levels of patient satisfaction and similar models are being utilised across many organisations. The role of POCUS in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 is increasingly recognised.4 Knight et al. describe a simple aggregated score formed by summating the degree of pleural and interstitial change within six anatomical lung zones showing good discriminatory performance in predicting a range of adverse outcomes in patients with suspected COVID-19.4 This may form an important addition to COVID-19 ambulatory pathways.

SAMBA, the Society for Acute Medicine’s Benchmarking Audit, initially focused on the Society’s key quality indicators, continues to flourish and grow. It now not only benchmarks performance but is being used to guide the development of UK clinical quality measures. Colleagues in the Netherlands are commencing similar work and describing international standards of acute medical care, an iterative process, is one of the ultimate goals of this work. SAMBA 19 continues to demonstrate the evolving complexity of acute medical pathways and highlights the need to define optimal quality indicators for acute medical care.5 The inaugural winter SAMBA adds further evidence to the concerns that during this period there is an unfortunate cocktail of both sicker patients and poorer performance.6 Adapting acute medical services to meet this challenge requires innovation and investment.

Those working in Acute Medicine should feel proud of their continued contribution to managing the acutely unwell patient and their impact on the sustainability of acute care services, particularly during this most challenging of years. The Society for Acute Medicine has tremendous pride in representing this brilliant workforce. Alongside, the fantastic work of teams this year, there have been multiple emotional and physical stressors. Many AMUs have experienced large numbers of patient deaths, often having to support their loved ones by telephone. The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was greatest among colleagues working in Acute Medicine.7 Tragically, some AMUs have lost valued colleagues from COVID-19. We remember these friends for their fantastic work they have done, thank them for their contributions to Acute Medicine and on behalf of all the patients they served, we express thanks; their dedication resulted in the ultimate personal sacrifice. They will never be forgotten.

References:

Riley B, Packer M, Gallier S, et al. Acute, non-COVID related medical admissions during the first wave of COVID-19:
A retrospective comparison of changing patterns of disease. Acute Med 2020; 19(4): 176–82.
Numan J, Clarke D, Malakouti A, et al. Triage Into Community for COVID-19 (TICC-19) Patients Pathway – Service evaluation of the virtual monitoring of patients with COVID pneumonia. Acute Med 2020; 19(4): 183–91.
Mort DO, Limbu D, Nunan J, et al. Abnormal Lung Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Suspected Cases of COVID-19 pneumonia with Normal Plain Chest Radiographs – A Case Series. Acute Med. 2020; 19(3): 162–167
Knight T, Edward L, Rajasekaran A, et al. Point-of-care lung ultrasound in the assessment of COVID-19: a retrospective service evaluation with a severity score. Acute Med 2020; 19(4): 192–200.
Holland M, Subbe C, Atkin C, et al. Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking Audit 2019 (SAMBA19): Trends in Acute Medical Care. Acute Med 2020; 19(4): 209–19.
Atkin C, Knight T, Subbe C, et al. Acute care service performance during winter: report from the winter SAMBA 2020 national audit of acute care. Acute Med 2020; 19(4): 220–29.
Shields A, Faustini SE, Perez-Toledo M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and asymptomatic viral carriage in healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study. Thorax 2020; epub ahead of print

EDITORIAL VOLUME 19 ISSUE 4: COVID-19: Exemplifying the importance and challenges of Acute Medicine Read More

Editorial Volume 19 Issue 3 – We are all story-tellers

Editorials, Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 113 – 172 (2020)

Story telling is a human universal1. It is as old as language. Creating and relating narratives form an integral part of how physicians understand and communicate about our patients and their diseases. We ask our patients to help us develop their story (‘tell me about when all of this first started’), and then we tell their story back to them to facilitate our understanding (‘let me just check I understood; this is how things have progressed’). We use individual patients to anchor our learning in medicine; conditions are better recalled when they are attached to a specific people. Thus, we write case vignettes to improve understand when we teach others. When we see an interesting case we advise our medical students to use the opportunity to revise the related conditions, as we know that an individual patient narrative establishes richer meaning and better recall.

Editorial Volume 19 Issue 3 – We are all story-tellers Read More

POCUS in Acute Medicine

Editorials, Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 61 – 112 (2020)

In this edition of Acute Medicine, Knight et al. demonstrate from SAMBA data that access to ultrasound machines and supervision is geographically heterogeneous.1 They raise concerns that this may lead to inequity of provision of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) and the benefits it can provide for patients. This point is well made: Since the development of the Focused Acute Medicine Ultrasound (FAMUS) competencies in 20162 there has been a steady increase in the provision of supervisors to 803 and the number of individuals completing training has increased to 56. Whilst this is to be applauded, our experience concurs with this paper that much of the ultrasound training is concentrated in pockets of expertise in particular hospitals.

POCUS in Acute Medicine Read More

Editorial Volume 19 Issue 1 – “Eternal Winter”: Acute Medicine the key to providing longer periods of summer

Editorials, Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 1 - 60 (2020)

As another winter season passes, many colleagues will continue to be working under immense pressures striving to provide high quality care for increasingly larger numbers of patients. The work of Acute Medicine teams to keep the “front door” safe are fundamental to the delivery and sustainability of acute care services. The challenges of innovating and enacting positive changes at times of such high service demand are not insignificant; but the specialty is blessed with rapidly expanding driven and dedicated international, national and local leaders.

Editorial Volume 19 Issue 1 – “Eternal Winter”: Acute Medicine the key to providing longer periods of summer Read More

Editorial Volume 18 Issue 4 – Decision-making in acute medicine

Editorials, Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 205 – 264 (2019)

Acute physicians make patient-centred decisions at the start of the patient’s hospital journey. Dozens more decisions are made by the individual members of the MDT (and, of course, by the patient) during the in-patient period. Decisions are made at every level of seniority and experience and range widely in scope and impact. The original articles in this issue are connected by a common thread: phenomena that inform and influence the decisions made by acute physicians.

Editorial Volume 18 Issue 4 – Decision-making in acute medicine Read More

Editorial Volume 17 Issue 4 – Assessing, treating and prognosticating from the front door

Editorials, Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 173 – 240 (2018)

In our daily working lives, acute physicians strive to provide the best holistic care to our patients from the moment they arrive in hospital. Experienced healthcare professionals develop a gut feeling (generally recognised as the nagging internal voice of professional experience) about patients who may be more unwell than appearances suggest, or who may deteriorate despite showing signs of physiologically compensating quite well. The papers in this issue challenge us to examine how we prioritise, prognosticate and risk-stratify the patients we treat in acute medicine, how we remain cognisant and skilled in treating patients with more unusual acute medical conditions, and how we allocate resources in the NHS.

Editorial Volume 17 Issue 4 – Assessing, treating and prognosticating from the front door Read More

Editorial Volume 17 Issue 3

Editorials

Acute Medicine is invested in patient care, and therefore multiple departments There is a myth that Acute Physicians only work in Acute Medical Units (AMUs). In fact, they tread a constant path between the AMU, the Emergency Department (ED), ambulatory care, Intensive Care Units (ITUs) and various specialty wards within the hospital. Just as our focus is not tied to

Editorial Volume 17 Issue 3 Read More

Editorial Volume 17 Issue 2

Editorials, Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 57 – 116 (2018)

As those working in Acute Medicine gather at SAMsterDAM2, the spring conference of the Society for Acute Medicine, the growth, reputation and global representation of the specialty continues to grow. Alongside, the traditional strongholds of the UK, Ireland, Netherlands, Denmark and Australia growth in Asia continues with an AMU now established in Pakistan among other countries.

Editorial Volume 17 Issue 2 Read More

Editorial Volume 17 Issue 1

Editorials, Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 1 – 56 (2018)

Acute Medicine remains a specialty in its infancy and, as such, faces many challenges associated with developing new ways of working. As the Society for Acute Medicine celebrates its 18th birthday the extraordinary role of Acute Medicine in both maintaining and indeed enhancing the care and welfare of patients is increasingly evident. However, scepticism still persists among some colleagues with regards to its effectiveness – a perception heightened by the difficult environment that currently pervades in acute and emergency care in the UK which mirrors the experience of many countries internationally.

Editorial Volume 17 Issue 1 Read More

Editorial Volume 16 Issue 4

Editorials, Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 153 – 212 (2017)

My time has come. After 15 years and over 50 editions it is time for me to hang up my metaphorical red biro, and hand over the role of Editor. It has been an interesting job, and I am extremely grateful to everyone who has contributed and supported the journal over this period. When I took on the position in 2002, this journal was very different to how it is today. Some readers may recall its original incarnation as the CPD journal of Internal Medicine, part of a series of publications produced at that time by Rila. Initially this was comprised predominantly of commissioned review articles, running over a 5 year cycle which was designed to cover the common conditions managed by ‘general’ physicians. As time progressed, the number of unsolicited submissions grew steadily – initially (and continually) dominated by case reports, but with a slowly increasing number of research-based articles as the readership expanded. The quality of these submissions improved further when we finally attained indexing in PubMed, which also attracted more international submissions. I am delighted that the current edition features research papers from the Netherlands and Singapore, both of which have a growing community of Acute Physicians. I remain hopeful that the number of acute medicine-related research submissions from the UK will rise as the speciality grows. The number of high quality abstracts presented at the Society for Acute Medicine (SAM) meetings is indicative of the amount of work that is going on, but it is disappointing that so few of these turn into publications in peerreviewed journals. Acute Physicians are busy people with constant and year-round operational pressures, which may mean that writing up  research is continually pushed down the list of priorities. Perhaps also the fact that the number of consultant posts across the continues to exceed the number of Acute Internal Medicine trainees removes some of the ‘pressure to publish’ which is felt by trainees in other hospital specialities.

My hopes for the future of this journal have been boosted by the appointment of Tim Cooksley as my replacement ‘Editor in Chief’, who will take over from the Spring 2018 edition onwards. Tim has been a hard working member of the editorial team over recent years, and prior to this was a regular contributor to the journal. He has a strong research background and is a leading member of the SAMBA academy and SAM research committee. I would also like to thank the other members of the editorial board without whose support and contributions this job would have been completely untenable. I understand that Tim plans to keep many of these colleagues in post, as well as bringing in some ‘new blood’ to create a fresh new vision for the future. I wish them all well, and will look forward to reading (as opposed to writing) these editorials.

Thanks, finally, to all of the loyal readers who have stuck with the journal over the past 2 decades. I hope that we have managed to keep you entertained and educated on those occasional moments of respite during the acute medical on-call. I wish you all well for the future.

Editorial Volume 16 Issue 4 Read More

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top

Start typing and press enter to search

Start typing and press enter to search