PRISMA Analysis of 30 Day Readmissions to a Tertiary Cancer Hospital

PRISMA Analysis of 30 Day Readmissions to a Tertiary Cancer Hospital

Abstract

Background: Hospital readmissions are increasingly used as a quality indicator. Patients with cancer have an increased risk of readmission.
The purpose of this study was to develop an in depth understanding of the causes of readmissions in patients undergoing cancer treatment using PRISMA methodology and was subsequently used to identify any potentially preventable causes of readmission in this cohort.

Methods: 50 consecutive 30 day readmissions from the 1st November 2014 to the medical admissions unit (MAU) at a specialist tertiary cancer hospital in the Northwest of England were analysed retrospectively.

Results: 25(50%) of the patients were male with a median age of 59 years (range 19-81). PRISMA analysis showed that active (human) factors contributed to the readmission of 4 (8%) of the readmissions, which may have been potentially preventable. All of the readmissions were driven by a medical condition related to the patient’s underlying cancer and ongoing cancer treatment.

Conclusion: The majority of readmissions of patients undergoing cancer treatment appear to be related to the underlying condition and, as such, are predictable but not preventable. This suggests that hospital readmission is not a good quality indicator in this cohort of patients.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" display_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

References

  1. Balducci L, Ershler WB. Cancer and ageing: a nexus at several levels. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5: 655–62.
  2. Moller H, Fairley L, Coupland V, et al. The future burden of cancer in England: incidence and numbers of patients in 2020. Br J Cancer 2007; 96: 1484–88.
  3. Berger J, Cooksley T, Holland M. The burden of cancer on the Acute Medical Unit. Clin Med 2013; 13: 457–9.
  4. Mansour D, Simcock R, Gilbert D. Acute Oncology Service: Assessing the Need and its Implications. Clin Oncol 2011; 23: 168–73.
  5. Donze J, Aujesky D, Williams D, et al. Potentially avoidable 30-day hospital readmissions in medical patients. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173: 622–8.
  6. Brown E, Burgess D, Li C, et al. Hospital readmissions: necessary evil or preventable target for quality improvement. Ann Surg 2014; 260: 583–91.
  7. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005; 173(5): 489–95.
  8. Cooksley T, Kitlowski E, Haji-Michael P. Effectiveness of Modified Early Warning Score in predicting outcomes in oncology patients. QJM 2012; 105(11): 1083–8.
  9. Smits M, Groenewegen P, Timmermans D, et al. The nature and causes of unintended events reported at ten emergency departments. BMC Emerg Med 2009; 9:16.
  10. World Health Organization Alliance for Patient Safety: Project to develop the international patient safety event taxonomy: updated review of the literature 2003-2005. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
  11. Naylor M, Brooten D, Campbell R, et al. Transitional care of older adults hospitalized with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52(7): 1228.
  12. Woodend A, Sherrard H, Fraser M, et al. Telehome monitoring in patients with cardiac disease who are at high risk of readmission. Heart Lung 2008; 37(1): 36–45.
  13. Garcia-Aymerich J, Hernandez C, Alonso A, et al. Effects of an integrated care intervention on risk factors of COPD readmission. Respir Med 2007; 101(7): 1462–9.
  14. Golden A, Tewary S, Dang S, et al. Care management’s challenges and opportunities to reduce the rapid rehospitalisation of frail community dwelling older adults. Gerontologist 2010; 50(4): 451–8.
  15. Soong C, Kurabi B, Wells D, et al. Do post discharge phone calls improve care transitions? A cluster-randomized trial. PloS One 2014; 9(11): e112230.
  16. Hansen L, Young R, Hinami K, et al. Interventions to reduce 30- day rehospitalisation: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(8): 520–8.
  17. Kent T, Sachs T, Callery M, et al. Readmission after major pancreatic resection: a necessary evil? J Am Coll Surg 2011; 213:515–23.
  18. Kansagara D, Englander H, Salanitro A, et al. Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: a systematic review. JAMA 2011;306: 1688–98

Request Permissions

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center’s (CCC) Marketplace website by clicking the button below:

Get Permission

PRISMA Analysis of 30 Day Readmissions to a Tertiary Cancer Hospital

10th April 2016
PMID: 26305081
Authors Affiliations
Timothy Cooksley MBChB, ST3 in Acute Medicine Department of Acute Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL Email: cooks199@ hotmail.com
Hanneke Merten VU University Medical Center
John Kellett Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of South West Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark
Mikkel Brabrand Department of Emergency Medicine Odense University Hospital
Rachel Kidney BA (Psych), MB, MRCPI Division of Internal Medicine, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
CH Nickel Emergency Department, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland.
Prabath WB Nanayakkara Department of Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, VU University, The Netherlands
Christian P Subbe Consultant in Acute, Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine Bangor University & Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital Bangor, Wales

PRISMA Analysis of 30 Day Readmissions to a Tertiary Cancer Hospital

Cite this article as:

Cooksley T, Merten H, Kellett J, Brabrand M, Kidney R, Nickel CH, Nanayakkara PW, Subbe CP. PRISMA Analysis of 30 Day Readmissions to a Tertiary Cancer Hospital. Acute Med. 2015;14(2):53-6. PMID: 26305081.

PRISMA Analysis of 30 Day Readmissions to a Tertiary Cancer Hospital

Share this article

Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.


Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top