Recovery after acute illness after hospital discharge – a prospective cohort study

Recovery after acute illness after hospital discharge – a prospective cohort study

Background: Long-term outcomes after acute medical and surgical illness are largely unknown.

Aim: To describe cognitive and physical function, health-related quality of life and risk of anxiety and depression after acute illness.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Methods: Home visit at three and twelve months measuring: Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool, Short Form Health Survey, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Trail Making Test.

Results: Of 101 included patients, 60 were visited at three and 36 at twelve months. The RBANS value was 84 (69-96) at three months and 88 (69-101) at twelve months.

Conclusions: We found a moderately reduced cognitive function three and twelve months after acute illness.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" display_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

Refernces

  1. Myers EA, Smith DA, Allen SR, et al. Post-ICU syndrome. J Am Acad Physician Assist. 2016;29:34–37.
  2. Huang C, Mårtensson J, Gögenur I, et al. Exploring Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Delirium in Noncardiac Surgery Using MRI: A Systematic Review. Neural Plast. 2018;1:1–12.
  3. Girard TD, Self WH, Edwards KM, et al. Long-Term Cognitive Impairment after Hospitalization for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: a Prospective Cohort Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33:929–935.
  4. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–577.
  5. Burcharth J, Abdulhady L, Danker J, et al. Implementation of a multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in major emergency abdominal surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. Epub ahead of print DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01238-7.
  6. Tengberg LT, Bay-Nielsen M, Bisgaard T, et al. Multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2017;104:463–471.
  7. Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, et al. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Preliminary Clinical Validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol.1998;20:310–319.
  8. Corner EJ, Wood H, Englebretsen C, et al. The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx): Validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; An observational proof-of-concept pilot study. Physiother (United Kingdom). 2013;99:33–41.
  9. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305:160–164.
  10. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–370.
  11. Reitan RM. The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage. J Consult Psychol. 1955;19:393–394.
  12. de la Vega R, Tomé-Pires C, Solé E, et al. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: Validity and factor structure in young people. Psychol Assess. 2015;27:e22–e27.
  13. Morin CM, Belleville G, Bélanger L, et al. The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. 2011;34:601–8.
  14. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14:540–5. Estrup S, Kjer CKW, Vilhelmsen F, et al. Cognitive Function 3 and 12 Months After ICU Discharge—A Prospective Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e1121–e1127.
  15. Duff K, Humphreys Clark JD, O’Bryant SE, et al. Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer’s disease: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23:603– 612.
  16. McKay C, Casey JE, Wertheimer J, et al. Reliability and validity of the RBANS in a traumatic brain injured sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22:91–98.
  17. Lee L, Heckman G, Molnar FJ. Frailty: Identifying elderly patients at high risk of poor outcomes. Can Fam Physician. 2015;61:227–31.
  18. Adam U, Habazettl H, Graefe K, et al. Health-related quality of life of patients after surgery for acute Type A aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;27:48–53.
  19. Jussli-Melchers J, Panholzer B, Friedrich C, et al. Long-term outcome and quality of life following emergency surgery for acute aortic dissection type A: A comparison between young and elderly adults. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2017;51:465–471.
  20. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, et al. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:683–693.
  21. Kumar M, Nayak PK. Psychological sequelae of myocardial infarction. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;95:487–496.
  22. Giovagnoli AR, Del Pesce M, Mascheroni S, et al. Trail Making Test: Normative values from287 normal adult controls. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1996;17:305–309.
  23. Wilk CM, Gold JM, Bartko JJ, et al. Test-retest stability of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:838–844.
  24. Duff K, Beglinger LJ, Schoenberg MR, et al. Test-retest stability and practice effects of the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27:565–575.

Request Permissions

To request copyright permission to republish or share portions of our works, please visit Copyright Clearance Center’s (CCC) Marketplace website by clicking the button below:

Get Permission

Recovery after acute illness after hospital discharge – a prospective cohort study

5th October 2020
PMID: 33020754
Authors Affiliations
Nadia Ahmed Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
Karen Emilia Grangård Olesen Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
Lone Musaeus Poulsen Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
Ismail Gøgenur Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
Ole Mathiesen Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
Stine Estrup Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark

Recovery after acute illness after hospital discharge – a prospective cohort study

Cite this article as:

Ahmed N, Olesen K, Poulsen LM, Gøgenur I, Mathiesen O, Estrup S. Recovery after acute illness after hospital discharge - a prospective cohort study. Acute Med. 2020;19(3):118-124. PMID: 33020754.

Recovery after acute illness after hospital discharge – a prospective cohort study

Share this article

Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.


Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top