Myocardial perforation is a rare yet serious complication following cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator device procedures.

In this article, the authors describe a case of right ventricular pacemaker lead perforation presenting to our hospital’s medical assessment unit with a clinical presentation suggestive of an acute pulmonary embolism. Treatment dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was commenced while awaiting CT scan. CT images were negative for PE however demonstrated RV lead perforation. Echocardiogram demonstrated pericardial effusion with the tip of RV lead in the pericardial free space. A rapid deterioration in the patient’s haemodynamics prompted an emergency pericardial drain insertion and successful RV lead re-position in the cardiac catheter lab. The patient recovered well and was discharged with routine pacemaker clinic follow-up.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" display_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

References

1. Mori, Hitoshi, et al. “Percutaneous Simple Lead Traction Is a Feasible and Effective Method for Right Ventricular Lead Perforations.” International Heart Journal, vol. 61, no. 1, 2020, pp.54–59., doi:10.1536/ihj.19-326.
2. Khan, Mohammed N., et al. “Delayed Lead Perforation: A Disturbing Trend.” Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 28, no. 3, 2005, pp. 251–253., doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.40003.x.
3. Kawata, Hiro, et al. “Occurrence, Mortality and Predictors of Complicated Cardiac Perforation in Patients with CRT-D: Based on the National Inpatient Sample Registry.” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 293, 2019, pp. 109–114., doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.018.
4. Akbarzadeh, Mohammad Ali, et al. “Identification and Management of Right Ventricular Perforation Using Pacemaker and Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads: A Case Series and Mini Review.” Journal of Arrhythmia, vol. 33, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1–5., doi:10.1016/j.joa.2016.05.005
5. Moazzami, Kasra, et al. “Trends in Cardiac Tamponade Among Recipients of Permanent Pacemakers in the United States: From 2008 to 2012.” JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, pp. 41–46., doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2016.05.009.
6. Refaat, Marwan M., et al. “Late Perforation by Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Leads: Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Clues, and Management.” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 33, no. 8, 2010, pp. 466–475., doi:10.1002/clc.20803
7. Matsuura Y, Tamura M, Yamashina H, Higo M, Fujii T, Shimamoto H et al. Defect in lung perfusion and ventilation scanning of patients with permanent transvenous implantable pacemaker. Hiroshima J Med Sci 1984;33:11–6.
8. Seeger, Walter, and Klaus Scherer. “Asymptomatic Pulmonary Embolism Following Pacemaker Implantation.” Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 9, no. 2, 1986, pp. 196–199., doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1986.tb05392.x.
9. Noheria, Amit, et al. “Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Transvenous Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Leads.” Europace, vol. 18, no. 2, 2015, pp. 246–252., doi:10.1093/europace/euv038