Objective: To ensure clinicians can rely on point-of-care testing results, we assessed agreement between point-of-care tests for creatinine, urea, sodium, potassium, calcium, Hb, INR, CRP and subsequent corresponding laboratory tests.

Participants: Community-dwelling adults referred to a community-based acute ambulatory care unit.

Interventions: The Abbott i-STATTM (Hb, clinical chemistry, INR) and the AfinionTM Analyser (CRP) and corresponding laboratory analyses.

Outcomes: Agreement (Bland-Altman) and bias (Passing-Bablok regression).

Results: Among 462 adults we found an absolute mean difference between point-of-care and central laboratory analyses of 6.4g/L (95%LOA -7.9 to +20.6) for haemoglobin, -0.5mmol/L (95%LOA -4.5 to +3.5) for sodium, 0.2mmol/L (95%LOA -0.6 to +0.9) for potassium, 0.0mmol/L (95%LOA -0.3 to +0.3) for calcium, 9.0 μmol/L (95%LOA -18.5 to +36.4) for creatinine, 0.0mmol/L (95%LOA -2.7 to +2.6) for urea, -0.2 (95%LOA -2.4 to +2.0) for INR, -5.0 mg/L (95%LOA -24.4 to +14.4) for CRP.

Conclusions: There was acceptable agreement and bias for these analytes, except for haemoglobin and creatinine.

[download-attachments container="div" style="list" display_icon="1" display_count="1" display__size="0"]

References

1. Future Hospital Commission. Future hospital: caring for medical patients. London: Royal College of Physicians 2013.
2. Maruthappu M, Sood HS, Keogh B. The NHS Five Year Forward View: implications for clinicians. BMJ 2014;349:g6518. doi:10.1136/bmj.g6518
3. Jones CH, Howick J, Roberts NW, et al. Primary care clinicians’ attitudes towards point-of-care blood testing: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Fam Pract 2013;14(1):117. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-14-117
4. Turner PJ, Van den Bruel A, Jones CH, et al. Point-of-care testing in UK primary care: a survey to establish clinical needs. Fam Pract 2016;33(4):388-94. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw018
5. Jones CH, Glogowska M, Locock L, et al. Embedding new technologies in practice - a normalization process theory study of point of care testing. BMC health services research 2016;16(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1834-3 [published Online First:2016/10/21]
6. Minnaard MC, van de Pol AC, Broekhuizen BD, et al. Analytical performance, agreement and user-friendliness of five C-reactive protein point-of-care tests. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2013;73(8):627- doi: 10.3109/00365513.2013.841985
7. Yeo CP, Ngo A, Ng WY, et al. Assessing Performance of i-STAT at the Point of Care in the Emergency Room. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 2011;20(3):157-61. doi: 10.1177/201010581102000304
8. Henriksen LO, Faber NR, Moller MF, et al. Stability of 35 biochemical and immunological routine tests after 10 hours storage and transport of human whole blood at 21 degrees C. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation 2014;74(7):603-10. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.928940 [published Online First:2014/07/06]
9. Geens T, Vertessen F, Malfait R, et al. Validation of the Sysmex CS5100 coagulation analyzer and comparison to the Stago STA-R analyzer for routine coagulation parameters. Int J Lab Hematol 2015;37(3):372-81. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12295 [published Online First: 2014/09/23]
10. Coskun A, Carobene A, Kilercik M, et al. Within-subject and between-subject biological variation estimates of 21 hematological parameters in 30 healthy subjects. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56(8):1309-18. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-1155 [published Online First: 2018/04/02]
11. Ricos C AV, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez A, Jimenez CV, Minchinela J, Perich C, Simon M. Desirable specifications for total error, imprecision, and bias, derived from intra- and interindividual biologic variation. 2017 [Available from: http://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm accessed 8th October 2017.
12. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Measuring Analytical Quality: Total Analytical Error Versus Measurement Uncertainty. Clin Lab Med 2017;37(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2016.09.001
13. Westgard JO. Useful measures and models for analytical quality management in medical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54(2):223-33. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0710
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-10. [published Online First: 1986/02/08]
15. Bablok W, Passing H, Bender R, et al. A general regression procedure for method transformation. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part III. Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie
    1988;26(11):783-90. [published Online First: 1988/11/01]
16. Mirzazadeh M, Morovat A, James T, et al. Point-of-care testing of electrolytes and calcium using blood gas analysers: it is time we trusted the results. Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 2016;33(3):181-doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204669 [published Online First: 2015/09/24]
17. Calvi LM, Bushinsky DA. When Is It Appropriate to Order an Ionized Calcium? Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2008;19:1257-60.
18. Rudolf J, Douglass J, Baron J, et al. Evaluation of the i-STAT point-of-care capillary whole blood hematocrit and hemoglobin: Comparison to the Siemens RAPIDLab 1200, Sysmex XE5000, and manual spun hematocrit. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry 2015;446:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.03.035 [published Online First: 2015/04/12]
19. Ng WL, Short TG, Gunn KN, et al. Accuracy and reliability of the i-STAT point-of-care device for the determination of haemoglobin concentration before and after major blood loss. Anaesth Intensive Care 2014;42(4):495-9.
20. Steinfelder-Visscher J, Teerenstra S, Gunnewiek JM, et al. Evaluation of the i-STAT point-of-care analyzer in critically ill adult patients. The journal of extra-corporeal technology 2008;40(1):57- [published Online First: 2008/04/09]
21. Seamark D, Backhouse S, Barber P, et al. Transport and temperature effects on measurement of serum and plasma potassium. J R Soc Med 1999;92(7):339-41.
22. Pena JA, Lewandrowski KB, Lewandrowski EL, et al. Evaluation of the i-STAT point-of-care capillary whole blood prothrombin time and international normalized ratio: comparison to the Tcoag MDAII coagulation analyzer in the central laboratory. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413(11-12):955-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.01.035
    [published Online First: 2012/02/15]
23. Drescher MJ, Spence A, Rockwell D, et al. Point-of-care testing for coagulation studies in a stroke protocol: a time-saving innovation. The American journal of emergency medicine 2011;29(1):82-5. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.020 [published Online First: 2010/09/10]
24. Dimeski G, Tilley V, Jones BW, et al. Which point-of-care creatinine analyser for radiology: direct comparison of the i-Stat and StatStrip creatinine methods with different sample types. Annals of clinical biochemistry 2013;50(Pt 1):47-52. doi: 10.1258/acb.2012.012081 [published Online First: 2012/10/31]
25. Veldhoen ES, de Vooght KM, Slieker MG, et al. Analysis of bloodgas, electrolytes and glucose from intraosseous samples using an i-STAT((R)) point-of-care analyser. Resuscitation 2014;85(3):359-63. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.12.002 [published Online First: 2014/01/07]
26. Verbakel JY, Aertgeerts B, Lemiengre M, et al. Analytical accuracy and user-friendliness of the Afinion point-of-care CRP test. J Clin Pathol 2014;67(1):83-6. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201654 [published Online First: 2013/09/13]